As my regular readers know, I took an active interest in the Republican primary in Colorado’s 5th Congressional District (the area around Colorado Springs) in 2006 despite not living there. (After all, there’s not much point in my trying to help Republicans in the People’s Republic of Boulder, where I live.)

Doug Lamborn, whom I think is best described as the 5th’s home-grown embarrassment will be challenged in next year’s primary by Jeff Crank (whom I supported last time) and possibly by retired Air Force General Bentley Rayburn (despite his pledge to drop out of the race if it seems likely he won’t win). Neither of these guys wants to be responsible for splitting the vote enough to let Lamborn win again, as happened in 2006.

As I was doing a little research on General Rayburn, whom I know very little about except that he made the rather stupid comment that he wanted to “open up hope within (Iraq) for the gospel of Jesus Christ”, I learned that General Rayburn had just moved to the 5th CD shortly before the last election. In other words, he’s a carpet-bagger.

At least the ultimate modern carpet-bagger, Hillary Clinton, had the sense to make a commitment to her new place of residence by buying a home. It appears that Rayburn has done no such thing.

Rayburn’s home address is publicly available, so I did a search on the El Paso County Assessor’s web site to see when he bought his home, and it appears that he is renting as the owner has an Indian name.

A Denver Post report last year noted that Rayburn lived in Teller County, but a search of Teller County records show only a piece of land owned by one Robert Rayburn, whom I believe is Bentley’s brother. Even if Bentley Rayburn had lived there, he did not own it.

And just for good measure, I checked the assessors’ records for the other counties which are covered by CO-5, namely Lake, Park, Chaffee, and Fremont, and found no record of Bentley Rayburn owning property in any of them.

So, General Rayburn, what exactly is your commitment to your district? What is your motivation here besides the laughable idea that we “need more Christian influence in Congress” (as a friend of Rayburn’s said in an email that appeared to violate military regulations for campaign involvement)? We need more support for the Constitution in Congress, not people who want to use positions of political power to evangelize the world. If your goal in life is to spread your religion, there are far better and more appropriate places than government.

My guess? Rayburn will not honor his pledge to drop out of the race if he’s unlikely to win (which he made because he sensibly claims not to want to be responsible for Lamborn winning again). He’ll lose to either Crank or Lamborn, and then he’ll leave Colorado…if he causes Lamborn to win again, he should have the courtesy to apologize, leave, and not return. The wiser decision by Rayburn, who doesn’t have any apparent commitment to the district, but just to his ego, would be not to run, especially if he truly believes that the 5th CD must be rid of the ridiculous Doug Lamborn.

For those of you who wish to try the property searches yourself to verify no record of Bentley Rayburn owning property anywhere in CD5, here are the links:

El Paso: http://land.elpasoco.com/
Teller: http://data.co.teller.co.us/AsrData/wc.dll?AsrDataProc~OwnerNameSearch
Fremont: http://www.qpublic.net/fremont/name.html
Park: http://www.parkco.org/search2.asp
Lake: http://64.234.218.210/cgi-bin/colorado_links.cgi?county=lake&search=owner
Chaffee: http://annex.chaffeecounty.org/assessorsearch/SearchByOwnerName.aspx

10 comments

# student of 9/11 on 10/19/07 at 15:25
[Note from Rossputin: I think this guy's rant about 9/11 and his links to a site which says that the US government was complicit in the attack are an interesting bit of minor lunacy, but not the type of offensive material which I refuse to post as comments. To be clear, my allowing a comment to go through is not the same as endorsing its content.]

If General Bentley Rayburn is, unlike Jeff Crank and Doug Lamborn, able to cease blindly hugging Jesus and/or GWB long enough to stop being a gravity-denying1 confession-ignoring2 man of blind faith who clings to impossible3 conspiratorial (ie, "19 guys with boxcutters did all that" [sic]) fairy tales, then I welcome his hat in the ring.

The only thing more revealing than the content of Bush's repeated voluntary loose-lips-sink-ships confession statements is the way all Democrats simply pretend like Bush just never made them!!!4

Please wake up and spell the treacherous treason already. (When a long train of abuses and usurpations evinces a design to reduce us to utter despotism...)

As long as good Americans remain bamboozled by such staged fake phony political 'opposition', and continue to insist upon taking sides in the big diversion, we deserve to have our Constitution stolen out from under us...

To Understand 9/11 is To Understand Much. (Once we rule out the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must contain the truth.)


1 http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml
2 http://911blimp.net/aud_BushImplicatesBush.shtml
3 http://911u.org/Physics/
4 http://fawcett911.us/DemRepNeoHistory.html
# 911 student on 10/21/07 at 19:42
"Minor lunacy", Ross? How incredibly dismissive of you... What big-lie-busting "interesting" evidence in any of those 4 web pages can you actually refute?

What is major insanity is to go on clinging to the discredited disproven impossible Official Government Conpsiracy Theory of 9/11.

Ross, are you (as are so many gravity-deniers) still waiting for a superior conspiracy theory to come along before you stop clinging to, and finally reject, the impossible one fed (propaganidized) to us by our govt[+]media?
# Rossputin [Member] Email on 10/21/07 at 20:40
Did you see the recent documentary with the fairly exhaustive research into and explanation of the physics behind how and why the towers collapsed?

Sorry, "911 student", but debating you on this stuff is really a bad use of my time...sort of like arguing with someone who believes the world is flat.
# 911 student on 10/23/07 at 18:39
P.305 of the 9-11 Commission Report -- the official govt account of 9/11 in which U.S. taxpayers invested million$ -- states that the S. Tower collapsed through the path of maximum resistance in ~ free-fall time ("10 seconds", even though it takes 9.2 secs to fall that far in/through a perfect vacuum~).

Can you run through a closed door as fast as you can run through an open one? Do you grasp what makes a parachute work? Surely you understand that steel resistance is far greater than air resistance...

Would you use a parachute if it meant hitting the ground at 90 mph instead of 100 mph?

C'mon, Ross. Stop asking me distractive diversionary (from my request that you refute any of the big-lie-refuting evidence on any of the pages I cited) questions about some 'documentary' you saw (and which further bamboozled you), and exhibit the ability to think for yourself, and then think your way out of the paper bags which are the huge horrible impossible lies of 9/11 already.

Impossible is impossible, Ross, regardless of how pervasive (as Flat Earth Disease once was) your beliefs may be.

And even if you still insist upon clinging to that impossible hateful enemy-creating fantasy about "19 guys with boxcutters did all that", that still does not explain Bush's repeated voluntary confession (to having had prior knowledge/view of the 'secret' attack) statements, nor the way all our institutions (including Bush's supposed political opposition) have simply pretended like he just never made his revealing remarkable statements.

http://911blimp.net/aud_BushImplicatesBush.shtml

There are a lot of good-evidence-supported holes in the official govt conspiracy theory of 9/11, Ross, and as long as you dismiss/disregard/ignore them all, I regret to inform you that that makes you the flat-earther (it's your analogy, and it seems to fit you well) -- like the ones who refused to look through Galileo's telescope -- here.
# Rossputin [Member] Email on 10/23/07 at 19:01
911 student,

I don't know what to say to you except that I think these silly theories about government involvement in 9/11 are put out there just to see if anybody is gullible enough to disagree.

Really, I don't know if you're just trying to make me look stupid by agreeing with you...which I suppose gives my opinion of what you're saying.

As I mentioned last time, this debate is a very bad use of my time.

Ross
# 911 student on 10/26/07 at 15:13
So because you cannot conceive of how the govt could possibly be responsible or even involved in the coverup (as if you're omniscient, and so whatever you cannot conceive of must not exist?), you will go on clinging to the IMPOSSIBLE Official Government Conspiracy Theory of 9/11?

I guess some people are too busy "living the American dream" to ever face reality...
# Rossputin [Member] Email on 10/27/07 at 10:51
911 Student, you may see my blog posting for 10/27/07 as my response to your lunacy:

http://www.rossputin.com/blog/index.php/a/2007/10/27/a_lunatic_of_the_right_surfaces
# 911 student on 11/02/07 at 00:13
So anyone who fails to go along with the physically impossible, hateful, enemy-creating lies of 9/11 is, to you, a lunatic?

You are in denial (the first of 3 stages historically faced by all great truths). You don't need a keyboard, Ross; get thee to a mirror, a shrink, and a physicist, Ross.

You are so adamant about your (participation in the mass) delusion that you are embarrassing yourself and your species. (You never did tell me how many [more] times Bush must confess to prior knowledge of 9/11 at the highest level of the U.S. government before you'd reconsider your delusional belief system. ...my fault for not better qualifying your willingness to honestly consider this topic prior to my wasting my time trying to enlighten you.)
# Lana on 06/17/08 at 10:48
Silly Willy neither candidates nor voters are required to own property to run for office or vote anymore. Even people who are female or have a little color on their skin vote now. Isn't that wonderful!
# Rossputin [Member] Email on 06/17/08 at 10:51
I didn't say he was required to own property. I called him a carpet-bagger, meaning that I think it takes some chutzpah to run to represent a place where you don't own property and haven't lived for a long time, even if it's perfectly legal.

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
I Am John Galt
Politics, economics, current events, philosophy and more, with a focus on free minds, free markets, and free people.

Send me an IM

Following Obama's Economic Policies

Following Obama

National Debt Clock

FACING UP TO THE
Nation's Finances
National Debt Clock

Obama Gone

Capitalist Examiner (please subscribe!)

Peoples Press Collective Contributor
September 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Search

Blogroll

XML Feeds

Contents

powered by b2evolution