How to destroy America?
I received the following article via e-mail. I don't know if it is true, but it's useful reading nonetheless and certainly seems plausible given the names involved. Also, I would point out that I don't agree with all of the xenophobic conclusions of anti-immigration activists; it is possible to be against all the evils of the leftist ideals of multiculturalism, diversity (for its own sake), and a culture of victimhood without having to oppose immigration or legal immigrants.
The American Dream? Think something like this isn't happening? It is happening as you read this...
We know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration over-population conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of American's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal - was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.
Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that
hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide."
Here is how they do it," Lamm said:
"First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: "The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy." Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."
Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.
Third, "We could make the United States a 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: "The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multi-cultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together." Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."
"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school"
"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of "Victimology." I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."
"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell -- E. Pluribus Unum -- From many, one.” In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."
"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural
country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."
In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."
There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly yet pervasively across the United States today. Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness.
Barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate "diversity." American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America - take note of California and other states - to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book 1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength."
Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast if we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American
Dream.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Rossputin on 04/19/06 at 03:20:21 am . Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. |

04/19/06 @ 07:23:56 am
Its true!!!
04/19/06 @ 03:41:27 pm
Although I find much of the article interesting and compelling, I find plenty of factual errors that defeat the overall argument -- or weaken it at least.
For instance:
"The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods."
Greeks, in classical times, were of 3 races. Pelagians, Dorians, and Acheans. Although the Pelagians were mostly destroyed by the Acheans, vestiges of their language and religion survived.
The Dorian invasion was not as complete as the Achean domination of the Pelagians. Athens, for instance, resisted Dorian invasion and remained Achean. Sparta fell and was Dorian (with Achean ghettoes on the outskirts).
Dorians were fair skinned and fair haired. Pelagians were not. Acheans were lighter than Pelagians but not as light as the Dorians.
The languages melded to some extent, but classic Greek has separate and identifiable influences of each. Same with religion.
Greeks spent most of their lives at war with one city or another. That they survived -- as an identifiable group of diverse people with some language in common -- is as much a tribute to Greek geography as anything. Crossing Greek terrain on foot to wage war is just not fun.
I think civilizations destroy themselves demographically and through culture wars; language is a red herring that is simply a marker for culture difference. Example: cosider multi-language societies that hold together because the national identity and culture is common and strong -- Switzerland, Sweden, Italy.
Suicide arrives by way of wealth and arrogance. These engender selfishness, which leads to a self-involved and morally decadent lifestyle, which triggers widespread use of Malthusian practices, which reduce demographic growth, which require increase reliance on outsiders, which undermines the culture, which destroys the civilization.
This model, I find much more historically sound.
04/19/06 @ 11:29:43 pm
I have to agree with the Govenor.
04/20/06 @ 12:23:02 pm
By the way, look at: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/lamm.asp
04/30/06 @ 12:32:07 am
WHILE I HAVE BEEN TAUGHT THAT ALL MEN AND WOMEN ARE TRULY OUR SPIRITUAL BROTHERS AND SISTERS, I BELIEVE THIS AND I LOVE THEM. HOWEVER, I CAN LOVE THEM IN THEIR OWN RESPECTIVE COUNTRY. THEY DO NOT HAVE TO NOT HAVE TO COME TO AMERICA FOR ME TO LOVE THEM. THOSE WHO COME HERE SHOULD COME LEGALLY AND WITH THE INTENTION AND DESIRE OF ADAPTING 100% TO OUR LANGUAGE, CULTURE AND BELIEFS IN FREEDOM.
05/01/06 @ 02:31:01 pm
China, one of the world’s oldest civilizations, has survived thousands of years with two main languages with distinct cultural traits: Mandarin and Cantonese. Switzerland, a financial and politically stable nation at the center of Europe, has four official languages. India, the world’s largest democracy has dozens of native tongues and highly diverse regions. Indonesia, the worlds fourth most populous nation, is home to the largest number of languages on earth. Nations do indeed rise and fall, but there is no statistical evidence that single-language nations endure longer than multi-language nations. Fear, more so than any other phenomenon, will help destroy America faster than multiculturalism, immigration policy or ethic group.
05/01/06 @ 02:43:58 pm
Tim,
I am not a right-wing xenophobe, and I have traveled a lot (including to every place you mentioned in your note.) It is not a reasonable comparison to put the use of Spanish in the USA against countries which have, as you say, hundreds or thousands of years of history as multi-lingual.
In the case of Chinese, I would note that Mandarin was the language of government. So if you want to use that example, it would be reasonable to do all government business in English.
Switzerland is a fairly small country surrounded on all sides by different languages. They pretty much don't have a choice. Also, the languages are very regional. In other words you won't find a lot of Swiss-German spoken in the French part of the country and vice-versa. Indian government business is pretty much done in Hindi...and while it's improving I doubt India is a model we want to strive for. Same for Indonesia: They have one main language, and they are not a reasonable comparison to the situation here.
In India and Indonesia, people's identity is often much more closely aligned to their tribe or region than to their country. This is the goal that multi-culturalists want for America, and while not certain to destroy America by itself, it certainly is a step in that direction. Part of what makes America great is that people come here wanting to be American, not wanting to be primarily some of other culture but just happening to live here.
No, having Spanish spoken widely as a language of business or government won't destroy the country, but it certainly erodes its foundation and there's little reason to support or tolerate it. Given the opportunity to force government business to be done in Spanish, I think we should start moving in that direction...forcing hispanic immigrants/migrants to learn English is a great first step if they truly want to become American some day.