Swine Flu is not Obama's Katrina
I’ve heard some Republican radio personalities wonder aloud whether the H1N1 pandemic is going to be Barack Obama’s Hurricane Katrina. I’d argue it shouldn’t be – which is not to say it won’t be.
The late and undersized deliveries of the “swine flu” vaccine were not caused by government, but by problems at certain vaccine manufacturers (problems which were fixed fairly quickly but which nevertheless threw off the anticipated vaccine schedule.)
And while this may be a shocking concept not just to liberals but even to many independents and conservatives (and not so shocking to libertarians), I have to wonder why people are so utterly, slavishly, unthinkingly reliant on government to deal with this problem.
Is there really a reason that we needed or need government intervention to get efficient and effective production and distribution of the vaccine? Yes, people will argue that “public health” is the concern of the government.
I think the case for that is borderline, and the case for a somewhat worse than normal strain of a flu virus being the responsibility of the federal government is not easy to make.
Rather than blame the federal government, people should reconsider reliance on the private sector, which has ways of getting hammers and toilet seats to customers for single- or double-digit numbers of dollars rather than three- or four-digit numbers for which government is known.
More than the federal government’s fault for getting the vaccine to people in the time and quantities demanded, it’s the peoples’ fault for relying on the government.
That said, I do believe that if the pandemic worsens and there remain substantial problems in vaccine delivery, people will blame Obama in the same way they blamed Bush for a hurricane. (To be fair, there are some real arguments to be made about the Bush Administration failing to do what they needed to, and about much of the New Orleans damage actually being caused by the government’s shoddy construction and planning of levees.) In other words, Obama has far less to answer for in this situation than Bush did during Katrina. But politics ain’t beanbag and Obama will be taken to task if things don’t improve soon.
Unfortunately, the result of would-be conservatives attacking Obama over this issue will be to imply that conservatives have found another area in which they believe the federal government should do more rather than less. And it’s that kind of political miscalculation that deservedly cost the GOP so dearly in the past two election cycles. Like it or not, Mr. Politician, at some point principles do matter.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Rossputin on 10/29/09 at 03:10:06 am . Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. |


10/29/09 @ 11:57:30 am
I agree that the vast preponderance of New Orleans’ damage was caused by shoddy levee workmanship (that is, they were not overtopped by the water, but just could not withstand the force of the water and wind behind them).
However, I disagree that it was the fault of the Bush Administration. The workmanship predated his administration by years.
I do not believe it is the responsibility of the Federal Government to keep constantly mobilized and at the ready the resources required to mitigate the damages of such a disaster. It should be the responsibility of the State and local governments to assess what kinds of disasters are most likely, know where resources are and have a plan in place to get the resources to the disaster as soon as possible, and to make relief efforts run smoothly. FEMA ought to have processes outlined that the States can use for planning, but local governments should know better what they will need, what is available and where, and how the mobilization should be organized.
Just my thoughts.
G
10/29/09 @ 01:52:31 pm
Greg,
I basically agree with you.
My point was that the Feds have some responsibility where they created the problem, which is not the case with an illness (despite what Farrakhan says.)
10/29/09 @ 06:36:22 pm
Great article. I don't quite agree with the "pandemic worsens" statement. I haven't been following the news overly close, but i don't think that there has been enough actually confirmed cases of H1N1 deaths to even reach normal flu related deaths per a given time. You are so very right that people and the private sector need to take responsibility for their own lives and social environment.
On the Barack Obama’s Hurricane Katrina issue, I also say that it shouldn't be and think that it wouldn't be. I will be amazed if pretty much anything will be solidly blamed on the President. Remember, the evil pharmaceutical industry with all of their "huge" profits will bear the brunt.
Two of my four daughters have had a serious bout with something flu-like in the last two weeks. Both were "diagnosed" with the swine flu. Alas neither was actually given a test that could confirm they had H1N1. We were told that it was the swine flu by the medical staffs. I feel that there will be a very large over reporting of H1N1 cases.
Remember that News is a business, and bad news sells. Some, not necessarily all or even most, news outlets lean left and tend to bolster the Democrats' agenda. A serious epidemic with the Federal Government as the only entity to come to the rescue is just what the doctor ordered. I seem to remember a quote. Something like 'We don't want to waste a good crisis." An epidemic will further the push for a National Health Care system.
Healthy natural foods along with following your doctors recommendations go a long way to prevent illness.
I'm going on too long. Again, Great short piece that says a lot quickly.
RichardS
10/29/09 @ 06:43:26 pm
Richard,
Thanks for the compliment.
I agree with your implication that H1N1 might not end up being much worse than any other flu season. That said, most flu seasons cause deaths from a range of viruses, not just one, and we haven't seen one in a while which is this contagious. Interestingly, this one also seems to be avoiding old people.
I do think it's a pandemic, but that doesn't mean it's a disaster.
I'm curious...how did you run into my article?
10/30/09 @ 01:29:57 pm
I don't fully agree with you.
Katrina was not Bush's fault, except to the extent that the Army Corps of Engineers was asleep at the switch. Unlike Greg, I think the primary responsibility for thees disasters is local and state. Notice that Mississippi endured pretty much the same damage as Louisiana (the coastal part of the state was razed) and yet recovered. Similar story in the Dakotas this year. The problem in Louisiana was people sitting on their duff complaining nobody was coming to help them, instead of rolling up their sleeves and cleaning up their neighborhoods and cities.
That being said, I do think that any fall-out from H1N1 or seasonal influenza should be blamed on the Obama administration. This is not by default, but because of their action. They pre-empted the private sector from planning for the events; they established rules for who would get the vaccine and when; they seized control of the vaccine's distribution and ordering; the set prices.
It's interesting to note all my local providers are out of influenza vaccine. It does not matter how much I'm willing to pay -- it's simply not available. I've never had a hard time finding a place to buy penicillin.
It reminds me of the Russians in Kandalaksha: "petrol is very cheap in Kandalaksha, but there isn't any."
Of course, it's the government's fault.
10/30/09 @ 01:35:55 pm
Freak,
You make a good point, but in the end it reinforces my point (which I presume you agree with anyway) that conservatives should not argue that the government should have done "more" or "better", but instead that the government should have done less.
The problem is that Americans are so spoiled and soft that they're not used to hearing arguments like that and might not take it too well.