Rossputin.com - Latest Comments on The Biggest Reasons

katesanchez [Member] in response to: The Biggest Reasons

katesanchez [Member] — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:51:52 +0000

good info

airbus [Member] in response to: The Biggest Reasons

airbus [Member] — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:58:58 +0000

Alot of people told me "he needs more time to finish the job". In 4 years it will be the fault of republicans in congress, even though they will have caved in to tax hikes. I believe the democrats will run the mayor of LA in 2016, another historic candidacy. We could run Rubio and Martiniez but wouldn't make any difference as far as them being historic because conservative minorities are not real minorities. It would help if republicans would not agree to debates moderated by democrat moderators and appear on talk radio. The one time Romney appeared on Laura Ingraham's show, he was asked "what is your strategy if the economy appears to turn around, what do you do then". He answered, "do you have a better strategy?" and then refused to go back on her show. My bottom line question is how do you win against people who boldly lie and repeat the lies often enough and it's taken as main stream truth?

The Freak [Member] in response to: The Biggest Reasons

The Freak [Member] — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:34:57 +0000

Republicans will never win again until they stop stooping to elections based on "are you better off," or "who can help you more," or "will jobs be created." To win, they must frame elections on American values, first and foremost "freedom," followed by "e pluribus unum (bottom up government)."

Margaret Thatcher understood this a long time ago. Liberals (in the traditional, John Locke conception of this word) must win on values, not on outcomes. She and Reagan made this point abundantly. Elections must be about values and the first value is freedom -- the economy will follow.